Skip to contentSkip to bottom of the pageSkip to top of the page

Sustainability reporting as a strategic and differentiating element

  • The regulatory context
  • The double materiality analysis
  • ESG Information Disclosed
  • The connectivity with economic-financial information
  • The European Taxonomy

The regulatory context

The value we give to transparency

Sustainability Reporting represents a key opportunity to analyse and share our sustainability performance with stakeholders.

From 2024, the Integrated Report has been replaced by a dedicated section within the Management Report, in line with the entry into force of the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD). The new regulation also introduces the European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS), which define the new mandatory reporting standards.

Alignment with the CSRD has enabled us to consolidate the path already undertaken in the sustainability area, strengthening processes, technological tools and governance, while promoting an increasingly structured dialogue with stakeholders in the name of transparency.

The double materiality analysis

The identification of material topics

The double materiality analysis enables the identification of the most significant sustainability topics for our Group and for stakeholders, guiding our long-term strategy and initiatives.

In 2025, the analysis was updated in line with the ESRS standards, adopting an approach that considers both the impacts of our activities on the environment and society (impact materiality) and the ESG risks and opportunities that may influence economic and financial performance (financial materiality).

The process involved both internal functions and external stakeholders, leading to the identification of the main impacts, risks and opportunities relevant to the Group.

  • ESG risks and opportunities that could have a significant financial impact on A2A’s financial position and performance.

    The assessment of risks and opportunities was carried out in line with the Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) Policy, assigning a rating based on impact and likelihood after taking mitigation measures into account. ESG risks and opportunities are integrated into the ERM framework and managed in the same way as non-ESG risks; those assessed as medium-high or high are considered material.
    The analysis was further strengthened through the involvement of 20 stakeholders from the financial community, who were asked to prioritise risks and opportunities. The 11 responses received broadly confirmed the internal assessments and served as a benchmark in the event of any discrepancies.

  • Material ESG topics on which the Company may have a significant impact on the economy, the environment and society.

    The assessment of sustainability impacts was conducted with the involvement of 24 internal functions, which assigned a score from 1 to 5 to the impacts within their respective areas of responsibility, considering both severity and likelihood. For negative human rights impacts, in line with the ESRS, severity was given greater weight than likelihood. The results were consolidated and classified into four levels of significance, with the materiality threshold set at medium-high level.
    The analysis was further strengthened through the involvement of external stakeholders (32 participants across 12 stakeholder categories), who were invited to complete a survey assessing the severity and likelihood of impacts. The 20 responses received broadly confirmed the internal assessments and served as a point of comparison in the event of any discrepancies.

  • Resulting in the identification of 51 material impacts, 32 risks and 11 opportunities. The ESRS topics identified as material from the two perspectives are presented below.

    ESRS TopicImpact materiality  Financial materiality
     Impacts Risks Opportunities
    E1 - Climate Changexxx
    E2 – Pollutionxx 
    E3 - Water and marine resourcesxx 
    E4 - Biodiversity and ecosystemsxxx
    E5 - Circular economyxx 
    S1 - Own workforcexx 
    S2 - Workers in the value chainxx 
    S3 - Affected communitiesxxx
    S4 - Consumers and end-usersxxx
    G1 - Business conductxxx

    The results of the Double Materiality Assessment were presented to the ESG and Local Area Relations Committee and to the Control and Risk Committee. They were subsequently approved by the Board of Directors at its meeting of 11 November 2025.

     

ESG Information Disclosed

Key Highlights of A2A’s Sustainability Reporting

The connectivity with economic-financial information

An integrated document

The main objective of the CSRD is to place sustainability results on an equal footing with those reported in the statutory financial statements and to recognize their natural connection. Connectivity is therefore a crucial element in the preparation of the Financial Statements Package.

Economic-financial and sustainability information are managed in an integrated manner, with the aim of ensuring consistency and alignment across the different reporting areas. This approach makes it possible to present the company’s performance and main risk factors clearly and transparently, providing an overall and coherent view of both economic results and sustainability topics.

The Internal Control System

Reliable data and information

With the entry into force of the CSRD, we have introduced a specific internal control system, integrated into the broader Internal Control and Risk Management System and aligned with Model 262.

To achieve this objective, a risk management and internal control model has been defined and progressively implemented, designed to ensure data quality and to support the Chief Executive Officer and the Manager in charge of preparing the corporate financial reports in issuing certifications to the market regarding the compliance of Sustainability Reporting with European reporting standards (ESRS) and with the specifications adopted pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2020/852 (the so-called EU Taxonomy).

The 2025 Sustainability Report was subjected to a limited review by the independent audit firm KPMG S.p.A.

Furthermore, with the entry into force of the CSRD, we introduced a specific internal control system, integrated into the broader Internal Control and Risk Management System and aligned with Model 262.

The European Taxonomy

Share of eco-sustainable Revenues, CapEx, OpEx

The European Taxonomy is a classification system for economic activities that contribute to the following environmental objectives: climate change mitigation, climate change adaptation, sustainable use and protection of water and marine resources, transition to a circular economy, pollution prevention and control, and the protection of biodiversity and ecosystem health.

The analyses carried out have led to the identification of the share of Revenues, CapEx and OpEx considered eligible and/or aligned with the European Taxonomy.
Below are the results for 2025:

Revenues

Revenue - Eligible - Aligned
Revenue - Eligible - Aligned

CapEx

CapEx - Eligible – Aligned
CapEx - Eligible – Aligned

OpEx

OpEx - Eligible - Aligned
OpEx - Eligible - Aligned
Skip to top of the page